On (09/02/16 07:54), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 03:07:21PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (19/06/15 14:26), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 11:49:10PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
ehlo,
We have 19 patches in 1.11 branch on top of latest release (1.11.7) I went through bugs filed against 1.11 branch and filter crashes and the most important bugs. Attached are cherrry-picked patches from 1.12/master So we can release the latest 1.11 version. It will be just a bug-fix release. So some conservative distribution can use it or in another words. we don't want have 1.11 branch neither in unreleased not in unclosed state :-)
BTW I test packages with LDAP KRB5 and AD test. Of course there are any regressions because it is a bug fix only release.
LS
I applied the patches and built the SRPM: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10164975 It worked, so ACK..
Do you want to push the patches and release the tarball?
Here is an updated patch set. I tested it with ldap, krb5, proxy and ad provider. and there were no failure. Except of missing features :-) But I wanted to backport only crashes and bug-fixes.
If we do not want to include patch with negroup leak then we can release latest 1.11 version.
I would like to include the netgroups fix and also 52e3ee5c5ff2c5a per Timo's request on IRC.
I didn't try to backport they look simple. I think we can push them after this big patchset which is tested.
I would rather retest one more time with extra 2 patches because it would be the latest release and want to be sure we do not break anything.
LS