On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 03:07:21PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (19/06/15 14:26), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 11:49:10PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> ehlo,
> >>
> >> We have 19 patches in 1.11 branch on top of latest release (1.11.7)
> >> I went through bugs filed against 1.11 branch and filter
> >> crashes and the most important bugs.
> >> Attached are cherrry-picked patches from 1.12/master
> >> So we can release the latest 1.11 version. It will be just a bug-fix
release.
> >> So some conservative distribution can use it or in another words.
> >> we don't want have 1.11 branch neither in unreleased not in unclosed
state :-)
> >>
> >> BTW I test packages with LDAP KRB5 and AD test. Of course there are any
> >> regressions because it is a bug fix only release.
> >>
> >> LS
> >
> >I applied the patches and built the SRPM:
> >
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10164975
> >It worked, so ACK..
> >
> >Do you want to push the patches and release the tarball?
> Here is an updated patch set.
> I tested it with ldap, krb5, proxy and ad provider.
> and there were no failure. Except of missing features :-)
> But I wanted to backport only crashes and bug-fixes.
>
> If we do not want to include patch with negroup leak
> then we can release latest 1.11 version.
I would like to include the netgroups fix and also 52e3ee5c5ff2c5a per
Timo's request on IRC.
I didn't try to backport they look simple.
I think we can push them after this big patchset which is tested.
I would rather retest one more time with extra 2 patches
because it would be the latest release and want to be sure
we do not break anything.
LS