On Tue, 2013-11-12 at 10:45 +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:27:48AM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> While testing I came across an oddness which we might want to fix. The
> sssd_be processes can receive SIGUSR1 individually and go offline. But
> the SIGUSR2 is not handled by sssd_be directly but only by the monitor
> which then send a reset offline request to all backends. Shall sssd_be
> handle SIGUSR2 as well?
Which patches should be pushed? #1 and #3 from the original mail and #2
from the follow up?
(on a tangent: Can we please always resend all patches?)
Sorry about that, I thought of sending them all, and then ...
(on a tangent: Can we please always trim the quoting when replying to
emails, we have some mails on this list that are thousands of line long
just to comment on a single phrase all the way down at the end)
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York