On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 04:46:07PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 03:47:13PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:53:46AM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm resending a patch for ticket #2870 on behalf of the original
> > > reporter who also kindly submitted a patch.
> > >
> > > The patch looks good to me, as soon as we fix CI, I'll submit it as
> > > and I think we can push it..
> > > From 79e3fe4052b0bdb0ca6b9c62686cacb581df0044 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > From: Mathieu Deaudelin-Lemay <contrib(a)mdeaudelin.net>
> > > Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 11:56:11 -0500
> > > Subject: [PATCH] Changes to allow SSSD to be used for access control with
> > > machine account belonging to a domain controller.
> > CI passed:
> > http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/33/92/summary.html
> > Conceptually the patch was already agreen on by Simo in the ticket. The
> > code looks good to me as well, so if there is no opposition, I'll push
> > it.
> I checked that the value of UAC_SERVER_TRUST_ACCOUNT is the right one.
> Since you already run the CI I'd say ACK.
Thank you for checking, pushed with your RB:
Is there a reason why this patch could
not be in stable branch?
Timo asked it on #sssd.