On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 09:59 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 14:24 +0200, Jan Zeleny wrote:
jzeleny-014-3-cache-cleaning-utility.patch:
Nack.
One additional comment. I think it's fine for us to just skip over any
failures and keep trying, because this is a non-destructive operation.
Our worst-case scenario is that some entries stay in the cache too long.
As long as we print an error message for any entry that was skipped, I
think it's acceptable.