On May 19, 2010, at 4:51 AM, Jakub Hrozek <jhrozek(a)redhat.com> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 05/19/2010 01:04 AM, David O'Brien wrote:
> Recently it was recommended that I not include the LOCAL domain,
> nested
> groups, and related functionality in the end-user doc (limiting it to
> the man pages). This raises the following issue:
>
> There is a section in the draft doc at present, "Using the SSSD
> Management Tools", which includes info on working with users, groups,
> nested groups, examples, etc., all of which will disappear if we
> remove
> LOCAL domains from the topic list. Is this what we want? I know we're
> moving towards the "SSSD functions transparently in the b/g when
> needed"
> approach, but I want to double-check before I remove this section
> (about
> 2 pages).
>
> Thanks
Right now the local domain plus the management tools are usable
primarily for testing, their only benefit is nested groups.
I vote for not documenting them in the deployment guide, but leaving
the
documentation in the SSSD sources (manpages, config file example..)
I agree.