On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 04:06:37PM +0100, Pavel Reichl wrote:
On 01/25/2016 08:54 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 05:16:37PM +0100, Pavel Reichl wrote:
>>attached patch does not seem to suffer from these errors any more.
>>Shall I ask user who reported the bug If he is willing to test this new version
of the patch? IIRC he needs more then a week for a testing to be conclusive...
>Yes, please. We can do the review in the meantime.
>sssd-devel mailing list
User just confirmed that packages seem to be running fine on the test host, no memory
Right and with the help of the talloc patch in the first mail I've also
verified that the talloc usage stays the same.