On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 09:20 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 at 04:26:36PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> While checking if our custom signal handlers properly handle errno, I
> stumbled on a few cleanups, they are attached.
> turns out our few signal hanlders are errno safe, and tevent signal
> handling function is also fine.
> Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
> From 8244f7619c5042dc45751ce3bbff75f2dbc03e05 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Simo Sorce <simo(a)redhat.com>
> Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2013 16:11:04 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH 2/3] Signals: Remove empty sig_hup
> SIGHUP handling is simply not implemented, so just block the signal instead of
it is, see te_server_hup() and the usage is documented in the sssd man
> using a fake handler.
Ok does it mean I need to remove the part where I block the signal ?
Do you have any other comment ?
The sig_hup(int sig) function *was* useless ? Or is it there as a place
holder until te_server_hup() takes over ?
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York