On Mon, 2014-04-28 at 21:06 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 02:31:36PM +0200, Pavel Reichl wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 13:09 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:31:36PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > > On (22/04/14 11:39), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > > >On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:31:31AM +0200, Pavel Reichl wrote:
[snip]
> > > >> I think it would be best for sysdb functions
in case that no results
> > > >> were found to return both ENOENT value and 'properly'
empty list.
[snip]
So I'd say we should go ahead with the current plan, change
only returning ENOENT vs EOK+empty set and worry about errno codes
later.
OK, so if ENOENT is returned do we guarantee that output parameters are
valid and 'output count' is set to 0?