On (09/08/16 10:35), Pavel Březina wrote:
On 07/20/2016 11:10 AM, Pavel Březina wrote:
> CI: http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/50/01/summary.html
> The failure is about missing dependencies, unrelated to these patches.
> It depends on the sssctl failover patches due to changes in attaching
> dbus message to a talloc context. Now it is possible to also free the
> message with both dbus_message_unref() and talloc_free(). Since the
> sssctl patches are already in late review process I didn't want to
> change them.
I had a plan to test these patches
but there are still some regressions in sssd
and I would like to avoid introducing new ones without testing.
Do these patches block you or other patches?