On (04/05/15 14:51), Pavel Březina wrote:
New patches are attached. All review-issues should be addressed.
Those
patches contains also extraAttributes, group members and user attributes acl.
Do we want to implement group attributes acl also?
The groups and users attributes on group object do not reply with full
recursive membership at the moment since we do not store in on groups object
in sysdb... is it possible to leave it this way or should I compute the
membership? Sysdb only contains full user members (in memberuid attribute),
but it contains only direct group members (in member attribute).
Subject: IFP: remove GetUserAttr and GetUserGroup
Hash: 4d680cb2e44b453cd2822d3d0d937c336b1bad9c
Branch: master
Job: 1404
Tests: rigorous
Hosts: rhel7 failed
http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/14/04/rhel7/ci.html
rhel6 failed
http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/14/04/rhel6/ci.html
debian_testing failed
http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/14/04/debian_testing/ci.html
fedora20 failed
http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/14/04/fedora20/ci.html
fedora_rawhide failed
http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/14/04/fedora_rawhide/ci.html
Overall: FAILED
The summary above is available at:
http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/14/04/summary.html
http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/commit/4d/680cb2e44b453cd2822d3d0d937c336...
It is not a coincidence that all tests failed.
@see
http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/14/04/fedora_rawhide/ci-build-debug/t...
LS