On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 09:34:54PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> I would prefer that, yes.
I would prefer not.
> I am hoping other SSSD developers would chime in as well so that the
> decision is not a one man party, but I personally prefer the code to
> read consistently. If the socket underneath is a shared NSS one or a
> NFS one is an implementation detail.
But it has extremely important consequences on locking and thread
safety, and using aliases, while it may help readability in some areas
can also be quite confusing from the coherency POV.
OK, what is your proposal?