On 06/14/2014 11:55 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (14/06/14 10:47), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> On 06/14/2014 12:56 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> On (13/06/14 23:26), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
>>> On 06/13/2014 10:28 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> Let's summarize.
>
> Sure, it was satisfying deleting that much quotation :)
>
>> I don't like maintaing build dependecies in two different palaces
>> and you don't want to extract build dependencies from spec file.
>> We need to find a compromise. What do you propose?
>
> Can we agree on an acceptable level of dependency syncing, past initial
> development?
>
> Let's say, once we see four commits to contrib/ci/deps.sh related to Red Hat
> distro dependencies in a month, we'll switch to pulling them from the .spec
> file.
If you consider rhel6 then it is not a compromise. It is a duplication
of maintaining conditional build dependencies for different platforms
(rhel6, fedora) in two different places. It is not a simplification
and purpose of CI should be to simplify developers workflow.
I'm sorry, but that's my offer for now.
It's not a compromise, unless both of the sides yield their position at least
a little. I think I did yield mine, what's your offer :)?
Nick