On 06/25/2014 06:34 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 18:18 +0300, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> On 06/25/2014 05:33 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>> However if you are going to replicate dependency management then you
>> have to deal with version numbers of dependent packages as well.
>> I see you list a ton of packages in your scripts but w/o version
>> numbers. That will not work. And having to wade through CI results to
>> find out the problem lies in an older library being used is a waste of
>> time we should not put on ourselves.
>
> Hmm, I can't see anything besides "libdhash-devel >= 0.4.2".
> Am I missing any packages?
I think we are not strict in .spec file, but there are certainly issues
if you try to build against older libraries for most of our
dependencies.
How old ? Not sure.
Well, if neither the spec file nor "configure" have the information, then I
would hesitate to guess. Also, since they don't seem to care, I don't think it
will be very beneficial for CI to care either.
I'll add the libdhash-devel version requirement and any other requirements, if
somebody comes up with them.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Nick