-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 11/02/2009 04:01 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 14:06 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
>>> Looks good to me, I have only a minor nitpick, shouldn't the
> ENOENT
>>> error in sysdb_delete_recursive_op_done() be fatal ?
>>>
>>> Given it should never happen, does it make sense to allow to
> continue ?
>>>
>>> Simo.
>>>
>>
>> ok, it is now fatal as all other errors
>>
>> bye,
>> Sumit
>
> This new version adds a missing return after a tevent_req_done() call.
ACK
Simo.
Pushed to master.
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkrvT+EACgkQeiVVYja6o6Ok/wCfc9TRwKdjhMfq/xp0spaDzXCc
ZHUAnjE3cZK/49b8cYLPVen41Z14U/d6
=6iMa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----