On 09/13/2010 04:59 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
> Supported providers are mentioned in Description section, because there
> was already partial description present. Another possibility was to
> comment it as configuration option (e.g. create access_provider=ldap
> record there). I like this way more, but I'm not sure whether it is
> descriptive enough.
I don't really like that we're explicitly mentioning that there is no
access provider for Kerberos (since we have
open to create one). Can you
change it to be just a positive list of the providers it currently
supports? (auth and chpass).
Also, you should mention the chpass providers for both IPA and LDAP as