On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 01:37:01PM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 01:15:02PM +0200, Benjamin Franzke wrote:
> Hi Sumit,
>
> Should the spec file also include an /etc/alternatives integration, like
> cifs-utils has?
>
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/cifs-utils.git/tree/cifs-utils.spec#n90
yes, my plan was to include this into the spec file for the Fedora
package. I thought for the upstream spec file this is not needed since
cifs-utils upstream does not use it either.
On the other hand I guess the upstream spec file will be used mostly by
Fedora/RHEL users to replace the distributed SSSD packages. So it makes
sense to include it upstream as well. I'll send a new patch.
Please find attached a new version with alternatives.
bye,
Sumit
bye,
Sumit
>
>
> 2013/10/14 Sumit Bose <sbose(a)redhat.com>
>
> > and now with the patch included :-)
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 01:08:39PM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > as promised I created the spec file changes to include the cifs-utils
> > > plugin into the sssd-client package on Fedora and RHEL platforms where
> > > recent cifs-utils are available.
> > >
> > > bye,
> > > Sumit
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > sssd-devel mailing list
> > sssd-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
> >
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
> >
> >
_______________________________________________
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel