-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 02/15/2011 07:21 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 04:10:51PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Good catch. New patches for 1.5.x/HEAD and 1.2.x attached.
> Thanks the patch is working as expected, but I have a question about
> ldapi. It is possilbe to configure a LDAP server to require e.g. TLS
> even over ldapi, see e.g the discussion in
>
http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-technical/200906/msg00098.html.
> Do we consider this as a configuration error and say use ldaps is ldapi
> requires TLS or shall we allow TLS over ldapi ?
With these open questions, I've opted to drop the reference to LDAPI in
the ldap_uri_is_secure() function for now until we opt to address
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/609
New patch attached.
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk1adPkACgkQeiVVYja6o6PnmQCfRgS2zN0CFv1KWofX0NdRQ5gY
RqMAnRhmeJ22CHzktbMV5+M5/8iuDs8Z
=3Nsd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----