-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 03/08/2010 05:07 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 03/08/2010 03:37 PM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 11:50:38AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 03/08/2010 08:40 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
>>>> This new version makes it a configuration error if both lists are
>>>> defined in the config file.
>>>> bye,
>>>> Sumit
> Nack (though these are nitpicks)
> I'd prefer it if the simple provider had its own subdirectory like the
> LDAP, KRB5 and IPA providers.
> Also, I'd rather that the interface for simple_access_check was passed
> the simple_ctx, rather than the allow_users and deny_users lists. This
> way, if we decide to add an additional feature (like resolution order),
> we're already carrying anything that the context might require.
>> new version attached.
>> bye,
>> Sumit
Ack.
Pushed to master and 1-1-0
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkuVdh4ACgkQeiVVYja6o6PIKACfY15CSpOF2VQynf2gJZRSJlSa
hA8AoJXZ/ETC41jU8Ej1oH1U95d6ECEX
=GAIH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----