-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 03/24/2010 05:46 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:30:09 -0400
Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> I agree with Jakub here. I think it's perfectly acceptable to include
> the SSSD in the rwtab. A person using a read-only root is probably
> doing so BECAUSE they don't care about persistence across reboots. In
> these cases, having our SSSD as a cache while the machine is up is
> still advantageous, because it allows the machine to survive a remote
> auth server outage.
>
> Yes, we'll lose the cache on reboot, and we will be unable to use SSSD
> for a provider=local setup, but I very much doubt that anyone would be
> using it for anything other than a reliable cache in this situation.
>
Ok, it looks like most are ok with it,
I retire my objection.
Simo.
Pushed to master.
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkurjEcACgkQeiVVYja6o6MMngCgoll0LKUAseN39eXGzXJz8CD4
XRMAn06b47uHTTR+1qXoKvCzpou6/yTB
=Yof8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----