The board would like to see SELinux enabled on the spins. Although it does not appear to be a formal requirement, I woule like to add it to ensure that the spin gets approval. This patch will make enable it permissive. I have tested this withe appliance tooling and it causes no issues. Can you all please approve this, push it to the repo, and I will re-apply to the board?
Thanks!
-- bk
From: root root@localhost.localdomain
--- fedora-aos.ks | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fedora-aos.ks b/fedora-aos.ks index a1b11ee..da03346 100644 --- a/fedora-aos.ks +++ b/fedora-aos.ks @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ lang C keyboard us timezone US/Eastern auth --useshadow --enablemd5 -selinux --disabled +selinux --permissive firewall --disabled bootloader --timeout=1 --append="acpi=force" network --bootproto=dhcp --device=eth0 --onboot=on
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 09:04:21 -0400, Bryan Kearney bkearney@redhat.com wrote:
The board would like to see SELinux enabled on the spins. Although it
does
not appear to be a formal requirement, I woule like to add it to ensure that the spin gets approval. This patch will make enable it permissive. I have tested this withe appliance tooling and it causes no issues. Can you all please approve this, push it to the repo, and I will re-apply to the board?
Hy Bryan,
You should be able to commit and push this change yourself as the fedora-aos.ks is in the spin-kickstarts repository, and you have commit access (IIRC). Since the Spin has been technically approved, all we do know is watch to what commits are being made to the kickstarts and check if it keeps moving within the technical boundaries we set.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 09:04:21 -0400, Bryan Kearney bkearney@redhat.com wrote:
The board would like to see SELinux enabled on the spins. Although it
does
not appear to be a formal requirement, I woule like to add it to ensure that the spin gets approval. This patch will make enable it permissive. I have tested this withe appliance tooling and it causes no issues. Can you all please approve this, push it to the repo, and I will re-apply to the board?
Hy Bryan,
You should be able to commit and push this change yourself as the fedora-aos.ks is in the spin-kickstarts repository, and you have commit access (IIRC). Since the Spin has been technically approved, all we do know is watch to what commits are being made to the kickstarts and check if it keeps moving within the technical boundaries we set.
Thanks.. i added that in and am still trying to work through the tradmark issues. However, I want to make sure I understand the next steps. What is after TM for getting the SPIN part of the F10 release?
-- bk
Bryan Kearney wrote:
Thanks.. i added that in and am still trying to work through the tradmark issues. However, I want to make sure I understand the next steps. What is after TM for getting the SPIN part of the F10 release?
Since the AOS spin is part of the appliance tools feature (which is accepted, right?), the next step is to contact Rel. Eng. and make sure they know that it includes a spin and appliance-tools should be used to compose -although using livecd-tools works too for the AOS spin, just doesn't give the best effect. In CC:.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen -kanarip
On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 08:16 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
they know that it includes a spin and appliance-tools should be used to compose -although using livecd-tools works too for the AOS spin, just doesn't give the best effect. In CC:.
pardon me?
Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Bryan Kearney wrote:
Thanks.. i added that in and am still trying to work through the tradmark issues. However, I want to make sure I understand the next steps. What is after TM for getting the SPIN part of the F10 release?
Since the AOS spin is part of the appliance tools feature (which is accepted, right?), the next step is to contact Rel. Eng. and make sure they know that it includes a spin and appliance-tools should be used to compose -although using livecd-tools works too for the AOS spin, just doesn't give the best effect. In CC:.
Thanks Jeroen. I kicked off a seperate thread with rel-eng.
-- bk