On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 14:35 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 14:30:47 -0500
> Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 12:07 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > At Today's meeting we discussed a perception issue with the WG and
> > > we decided we should write something about ti to try to correct the
> > > shot.
> > >
> > > Here is a first attempt at addressing the core arguments.
> > Looks pretty good. I've tweaked some of the wording and have a second
> > draft attached now. The only thing I'm not certain about is the first
> > two lines. Simo, were those meant to be the blog title and first line?
> Yes, I should have made that clearer.
> > Maybe instead title it:
> > "Fedora Server Working <strikeout>for</strikeout> With
> > Thoughts?
> I liked my proposal, and I am not sure yours "captures the eye", but I
> am not communication experts so I am open to any change.
I'm no communication expert either, but "Who matters?" sounds kind of
like "Who cares?" to me. I worry that it sends the wrong sort of
capture-the-eye message. I'm certainly open to something better than my
counter-proposal, though. It was kind of off-the-cuff.
I think it would be good to highlight what entails as "boring stuff".
Probably rewrite / shorten the second paragraph as well... From my
point of view, when coming into the WG I was greeted with open arms
from everyone (Even though I was new to the Linux / OSS community as a
whole and interacting with them). Even so, I was able to impact the WG
(At least I think I do.) by doing TC's, organizing a test-day, and
talking about a DE for F22 (Even though it fell through we where still
able to come up with some improvements for F22 in spite of that.) and
this was only within a 2-3 months span. Also I'm just a regular WG
member... So what I'm trying to say, you don't need a "voting
privilege" to have an impact in this WG.