I hope you feel better soon John. Coughs, bronchitis, and pneumonia seem to
be running through families where I live too. I think your thoughts about
the conclusions we came to about the NFS and LDAP and FreeIPA are in line
with what came out of our Matrix meeting today.
I'm interested to hear what you find with your RPi 5's and Fedora Server.
It was mentioned that you might be able to get it to boot since the
blockers could be in the area of displaying a GUI display, and Fedora
Server runs headless without a GUI desktop. From what I have found it seems
like the Linux distros that are currently working on RPi 5's are those that
are probably just bringing in the Raspberry Pi OS Kernel which has the
extra drivers built into the Kernel that are not in the mainline Linux
Kernels yet. I believe this is how Ubuntu often supports RPi shortly after
release, as well as Dietpi. I noticed that OpenSuse doesn't seem to support
RPi 5's yet either, so I think that a number of distros are waiting for
everything to be in the mainline kernel before they support installing on
RPi 5's. I still run RPi 1's with 512MB of RAM, but currently the only
distros that work on those well seem to be Raspberry Pi OS Lite and Dietpi.
I have tried Ubuntu on RPi 3's and I think I tried it on the RPi 4, but
honestly it wasn't much better than using Fedora, and it really started to
crawl when I tried running containers on them in Ubuntu. I know the RPi 5
is a huge improvement in hardware, so keep us up to date on how well it
does with different server use cases.
Peter Boy mentioned that in the docs there are other ARM boards that have
better experiences with Fedora than RPi's and are still in that price
range. I might look into one of those, but I kind of agree that in order to
make it into the consumer and home lab crowd having a great experience on
RPi's is important because of the easy of getting them with accessories
too.
Thanks for checking in on the mailing list John, get better soon.
--
mowest
--------->
discoverfoss.com
On Wednesday, December 18, 2024 7:03 PM (-05:00), John W. Himpel via server
wrote:
> I have an ongoing battle with bronchitis and pneumonia. This morning I
took the Dr.
> prescribed meds. Some of the side-effects are drowsiness. Shortly
after taking the meds,
> I fell asleep for several hours. When I woke up, the meeting was over.
>
> I am glad the NFS/Ansible issue was discussed during the meetings. In a
separate email on
> this M/L, I have added my input. I think the discussion has been quite
productive. My
> thanks to all who have participated.
>
> I'd like to take a swing at what I perceive as a possible mis-conception
that has often
> been expressed on the M/L. Certainly Raspberry Pi 4 (in all of it's
incantations) is/was
> not powerful enough to do very much useful work (from a server point of
view). But I have
> purchased a couple of Raspberry Pi 5 machines with 8GB of memory, 1Gb
Ethernet and m.2
> storage. While it does not have the power of an N100 Intel server, it
consumes much
> power, gives off much less heat and is usually much quieter.
>
> If one is willing to spend the time and effort, I am sure one can find
other SBC computers
> with better technical specs that can outperform the RPi 5. But market
share is important.
> For those of a certain age, one can recall that Betamax was technically
superior to VHS.
> But the vastly larger VHS market share won out. There certainly are
circumstances where
> RPi 5 is not the best solution to a problem. In that case, go with the
best solution (if
> that solution provides a measurable benefit). But market share,
financial stability of
> the vendor, reliable long-term support, and 3rd party hardware/software
addons will make
> Raspberry Pi 5 a choice for many in our target audience.
>
> The most recent kernel supposedly will support most everything needed
for use of the RPi 5
> as a headless server. I believe the Fedora currently used an O/S loader
that many of the
> other distributions do not use. According to emails on the Fedora ARM
M/L, that is
> because Fedora ARM server is aimed at being compatible with enterprise
level server usage.
>
> Fedora is already 12 months or so behind Debian/Ubuntu in being able to
boot up RPi 5. I
> realize their restrictions on non-redistributable software is more
strict than Fedora's,
> thus their shorter time to market.
>
> I would like to call upon the WG to be more vocal in advocating for
RedHat resources
> assigned to providing the necessary missing bits for a completely free
and redistributable
> RPI 5 distribution. I would hate to see Fedora fall even further behind
is the consumer
> market. Much of the younger set of users could be enticed to support
open source products
> on SBCs for real work and for self-educational purposes, but not unless
we have product
> they can use.
>
>
>
>