Good point. Making it a feature in F13 should carry things well, and a short name like "www" would be best.
Not sure what yo umean about helping folks with the upgrade.
Leam
Doug Warner wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
I often see problems like in bug#507406 [1] because I run lighttpd on some servers. Like the report says, having a separate group for web servers like 'www' or 'www-data' like debian does would go a long way for commonly installed packages.
How do others feel about this? Should we shoot for a feature for F13? What kind of problems are we going to run into with changing the group in all the web packages? What can we do to help people with the upgrade?
- -Doug
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507406
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFKsOCEJV36su0A0xIRAn5dAJ9xJjvunlhLCbMh5D+eRUEpQ5bM2wCfVIpb CApk4HvzEaTBx0D49R0aFJo= =i4Kq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ fedora-server-list mailing list fedora-server-list@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-server-list