* Peter Boy [13/02/2024 10:36] :
Unfortunately we are experiencing a common Fedora problem, nobody responds to it and the bug reports are left unprocessed and pile up. And because none of the maintainers respond at all, we have now also missed all the deadlines for improving something for f40.
Sad but not surprising...
- Would someone take the bug report and check my analyses?
Looking at httpd's git repo, it doesn't look like we change the configuration as shipped upstream to a significant degree. And, looking at httpd's subversion repo, _default_ is used both at the tip of the 2.4 branch and trunk.
I'll also argue that using virtual hosts for the domain matching your server's name is a mistake but I'm not sure how popular the sentiment is...
- Should we create a new https-server package which takes the binaries and provides an alternative configuration? Probably similar to default-editor-vim / default-editor-nano?
I really don't like this idea. I would much rather we work with upstream to improve the default configuration.
Emmanuel