Thanks for testing! Would you mind giving positive karma to the bodhi update for fedora-productimg-server?



Sent from my Galaxy TabĀ® S2


-------- Original message --------
From: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>
Date: 3/23/2016 7:19 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: server@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: Proposal: Changes to Fedora Server default partitioning scheme


On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 4:14 PM, Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 03/15/2016 12:17 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>> The following proposal comes out of the discussion at this weeks Server SIG
>>> meeting[1]
>>>
>>> Fedora Server will have:
>>>   * / (root) will be a minimum of 2 GiB and a maximum of 15 GiB
>>>   * SWAP will continue to be calculated automatically based on available RAM on
>>>     the system
>>>   * All unused space will be assigned to a volume group and available to be
>>>     assigned to new partitions or extend existing partitions.
>>>   * Anaconda will continue to handle the appropriate EFI and /boot settings
>>>
>>
>> This was approved at this week's meeting. I have submitted an update for testing
>> in upcoming composes:
>> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/fedora-productimg-server-24-2.fc24
>>
>> This can be tested with any current Fedora Server 24 install media (such as the
>> Alpha candidates). Simply add the following to the end of the kernel boot line
>> after booting the DVD or netinstall:
>>
>> updates=https://sgallagh.fedorapeople.org/f24-server.img
>
> This isn't working. I'm using
> Fedora-Server-netinst-x86_64-24_Alpha-1.7.iso in Boxes and also
> virt-manager, include the updates image as a boot parameter, but it's
> not loading in the environment and I'm not sure why.
>
> The journal shows the command line entry and that it matches:
> [    0.000000] localhost kernel: Command line: BOOT_IMAGE=vmlinuz
> initrd=initrd.img inst.stage2=hd:LABEL=Fedora-S-dvd-x86_64-24 quiet
> updates=https://sgallagh.fedorapeople.org/f24-server.img
>
>
> [    4.382596] localhost dracut-cmdline[236]: Using kernel command
> line parameters: rd.driver.pre=scsi_dh_alua rd.driver.pre=scsi_dh_emc
> rd.driver.pre=scsi_dh_rdac BOOT_IMAGE=vmlinuz initrd=initrd.img
> inst.stage2=hd:LABEL=Fedora-S-dvd-x86_64-24 quiet
> updates=https://sgallagh.fedorapeople.org/f24-server.img
> ...
> [   11.270044] localhost dracut-initqueue[696]: fetching live updates
> from https://sgallagh.fedorapeople.org/f24-server.img
> [   11.283040] localhost dracut-initqueue[696]:   % Total    %
> Received % Xferd  Average Speed   Time    Time     Time  Current
> [   11.283355] localhost dracut-initqueue[696]:
>           Dload  Upload   Total   Spent    Left  Speed
> [   12.079138] localhost dracut-initqueue[696]: [237B blob data]
>
> That's not the correct size though; on the web site it's 838K.
>
> ...
> [   12.357761] localhost dracut-pre-pivot[1215]: Applying updates to
> live image...
>
> There's nothing in /tmp to indicate it's applied. Nothing in any of
> the anaconda logs either.
>
> Adam's Coconut robot says the updates image test passed. But I'm not
> sure which compose ISO is used to test this.

Nevermind, it works. For whatever reason, there's no updates image
anywhere, and no indication it's been applied in /tmp which is what
I've been used to looking for with past anacondas.

I do get a 15GiB fedora-root LV, and installing all add-ons on the
DVD, there's only 1.9GiB installed. After installing Xfce and a bunch
of developer tools, I still have 12+GiB free. So I think free space is
not a problem for installation and updates.

Where it gets thorny is when the sysadmin copies VMs or a database of
any decent size onto the server. They might get a surprise if they're
not checking free space in advance somewhere. But in Cockpit, resize
for root is discoverable, it works, and it's done live. The
docker.service and docker-storage-setup.service aren't enabled by
default. On the plus side, they can install Docker, never actually use
it, and docker-storage-setup won't take 40% of the free space in the
VG for the docker thin pool. On the minus side, they have to be aware
they need to enable these two things and reboot (or start them) in
order to get things going.

So yeah, getting the word out I think will help with expectations. But
at this point I'm not seeing any big problems.



--
Chris Murphy
_______________________________________________
server mailing list
server@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/server@lists.fedoraproject.org