On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 7:35 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
<johannbg(a)gmail.com> wrote:
OK hold your horses I think this is jumping the gun a bit since a)
how long
we maintain an release and or how that release cycle is shaped depends
heavily upon the outcome of the baseWG
OTOH can already tell base what we'd
like (if this is/will be the consensus)
and the bigger unanswered question b)
How are you going to push volunteers on supporting software, they're using
in a different version any longer?
The beauty of this proposal is that except for the limited x.[34]
period, there is only one _supported_ version at any time - i.e. even
less load than current Fedora package maintenance. The "preview"
releases are roughly test composes of rawhide before branching, in
current terminology.
Mirek