On Monday, March 07, 2016 07:05:57 PM Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2016-03-07 at 20:36 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> How exactly is the boot.iso affected?
Well I haven't tested, but my *expectation* is that the Server boot.iso
will now have the same list of available envs as the DVD, since now
it's being set by pungi, not derived from the configured repositories.
I can double-check that, though.
> I don't see a problem with the generic
>
> Everything boot.iso continuing to ship minimal as an option. Though I
> think we need to rework what minimal actually means, since basically it's
> just the accumulated set of crap that pre-Fedora.next thought no system
> could live without.
Hey, it does the job...:)
The difference should be that everything uses anaconda defaults, the server
boot.iso will use the servers defaults. The only difference should be the use
of xfs vs ext4 for filesystems if I understand correctly what is overridden by
the server product defaults.
Dennis