On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:58:12PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
As with all the others who've weighed in so far, I agree that
the
optimal path is just for us all to talk to each other. I generally
prefer workflows that assume everyone's happy to work positively
together to a consensus solution over ones that assume everything will
be oppositional and must therefore go through a higher authority. So,
yep, IMO we should just talk to each other, and FESCo should only be
invoked to resolve irreconcilable disputes (of which we hope there won't
be any).
Yeah, and especially with the way Josh put it, this approach seems obviously
better. Let's just pretend I didn't suggest the other way. :)
Ideally I'd like to work fairly rapidly and get, say, the
initial
release criteria ready by the end of next week, and then get the
required test cases and matrices written between then and branching
(which is 'no earlier than July 8' on current schedule).
As someone who is not actually volunteering to do much more than cheerlead
for this particular bit of writing, that schedule sounds good to _me_....
--
Matthew Miller -- Fedora Project -- <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
"Tepid change for the somewhat better!"