On 11/06/2013 02:25 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 15:18 +1000, David Strauss wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 3:47 AM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> Container support is one of the topics that the Environments/Stacks
>> people are being tasked with investigating. The other thing is the
>> option for *limited* bundling of dependencies with something like
>> Software Collections.
> I'm frustrated with how poorly these working group tasks were defined
> before and during working group formation. Why are we finding out only
> now what each group is supposed to do? I was clear in my
> self-nomination that containerization is a key priority for me.
I have the same problem here.
I came into this thinking we wee going to build a Server oriented
distribution on top of the core,
As didi I but what does that mean to you?
but since yesterday's meeting I am not
so sure that is the goal anymore, it seem people want to do specialized
sub-server 'products' (whatever that means,)
That means from my point of view that we come up with a Fedora Server
Platform or Fedora common server infrastructure essentially the "server
layer" on top of the core/baseOS, installable as such ( without any
application on it or "product" ready for server application or
application stacks to be run on top of it ( or products )
I really would like some more clarity of goals for each WG.
I think we need to be able to define our own before we can expect to get
one from the other WG's