-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 11/19/2013 10:30 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 11/19/2013 03:22 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> If there are packages that belong in multiple products, I'd
> recommend that those be in the core/FOS definition.
? Dont you mean the Base layer ( FOSSP ) would be better suited
fo that since the core *really* needs to be on it's own release
Just to be clear, we haven't really agreed to this. You're taking a
bit too rigid a stand on that. As I mentioned in my other email, I'd
*really* like to hear from the larger QA group as well as rel-eng and
installer before we agree to separate the cycles, at least at first.
I understand your arguments in favor of this (I think), which is
heavily bound to addressing the kernel rebase behavior. I'm just not
yet certain it's something we can't defer initially.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----