2014-03-20 14:00 GMT+01:00 Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@redhat.com>:
> I agree with these, but we may not want to '1.0' the api until we
> are further along?

I'd like for clients to be backwards and forwards-compatible. So new
versions of clients should be able to fall back to older, deprecated
versions of the API and newer versions of the server should be able to
support any version of the API that is still meaningful (such as we've
added a new version of the API that gives more control, but the old
version could still produce a usable system compatible with older

That requires us to know and specify in advance how would the server know which version of the API the client is indenting to use.  So, for the record, do we plan to just add methods (e.g. DeployV2) to the existing interfaces?