On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 8:25 AM, Máirín Duffy <duffy(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 11/07/2017 08:22 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> How? Server is the only Edition using a Modular release for F27.
Ah, ok. When are the others going modular?
I think that's still very TBD. Maybe we're waiting to see the success
of Modular Server?
> I would suggest that the absence of a classic Server that is in
line
> with every other Edition for F27 (and likely F28) is what will
> primarily lead to confusion. As Andrea outlined, the user experience
> between F26 and F27 Server is going to be fairly different. If
> modularity becomes the norm across all editions, we'd be able to
> discuss dropping the "Modular" part in the name.
I thought we were releasing a classic server too. Plans must have
changed since I last kept up :-/ ?
I thought this was the plan originally as well, but now it seems not.
I don't really like it, but then again we're limited in what we can
produce and test so I understand the decision to not do a classic
Server.
josh