On Tue, 2014-03-25 at 07:15 -0400, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
----- Original Message -----
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Agenda Topics:
> * tcpwrappers (Does Fedora Server want to support them?)
One topic, does not have to be for this meeting. There was Documentation
FAD happening this week - one thing I promised to Docs guys was to
collect requirements on them. Do you have any particular ideas how it
should look like (to work for Server product), what would you like to
see documented etc.
This seems like a good place to introduce myself. At the Docs FAD over
the weekend it was decided that someone from Docs should become involved
with each WG, so I am going to attempt to help the Server WG in any way
I can. The biggest question the Docs group needs answered right now is
what do you need from us?
One reminder (not sure it has to be meeting topic) - Change
proposals
are due Apr 8th, so in two weeks. I don't see much showing up from
any WGs, maybe we do not plan any changes at all :).
Thanks
Jaroslav
> I was hoping we could also hear from QA and rel-eng tomorrow, but I
> haven't heard confirmation one way or another whether they will have
> anything to say.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAlMwmD8ACgkQeiVVYja6o6N5cwCdEF1Ac2tGkOJhZSF2Jq82r+9z
> xGQAn0h/+TbpVrKLSyZNRpY4K7P6lnfI
> =q0I3
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
_______________________________________________
> server mailing list
> server(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/server
_______________________________________________
server mailing list
server(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/server