On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 12:08:23PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 12:01 PM, Tomasz Torcz 👁️
<tomek(a)pipebreaker.pl> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 10:05:12AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>
>> > * Feedback: Easy "home media server" would be nice (sgallagh,
>> > 20:08:36)
>>
>> TBH I think that's quite a divergence from a typical "enterprise
>> server" that the Server SIG has targetted.
>
> But this is probably much closer to what "real-world" Fedora server
> deployments are.
What details have you got to back that up? I know of a lot of users of
Fedora Server that use it in an enterprise context, a lot more than in
a media server context.
Gut feeling, anecdata (with me included). I believe you know
enterprise Fedora users, but around my acquaintances home deployments
are much more prevalent.
I would love to see more Fedora usage in companies. I think the
proposition is not about dismissing enterprise servers. It is about
recognizing *the other* big group of Fedora deployment and treating
both groups equally.
--
Tomasz Torcz To co nierealne -- tutaj jest normalne.
xmpp: zdzichubg(a)chrome.pl Ziomale na życie mają tu patenty specjalne.