On 05.11.2013 00:53, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 11/04/2013 06:02 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Nov 2013 22:43:53 +0000 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
> <johannbg(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 11/04/2013 10:39 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>> This seem squarely in the cloud WG realm, right ?
>>
>> Hosting the cloud server falls under us coming up with the vm's
>> cloud images falls under the cloud SIG We handle the servers they
>> handle the images.
>
> That was my thought was well... we should make sure the cloud
> folks have the same understanding. ;)
>
I've had much the same conversation with Matthew as well. We seem to
be on the same page that it's certainly within the realm of the Fedora
Server to provide the hypervisor/container provider side of a cloud
infrastructure while they focus on the worker instances.
If the cloud WG limits itself to the guest end of things shouldn't it
really be called "cloud guest WG"? cloud WG sounds like it deals with
*everything* concerning cloud deployments.
Regards,
Dennis