On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 4:57 AM Peter Boy <pboy(a)uni-bremen.de> wrote:
> Am 12.02.2021 um 10:22 schrieb Peter Robinson <pbrobinson(a)gmail.com>:
>
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 8:58 AM Peter Boy <pboy(a)uni-bremen.de> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Am 11.02.2021 um 16:43 schrieb Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh(a)redhat.com>:
>>
>>
>
> I don't believe that is a fair ask. When someone is overloaded you're
> asking them to continue to be overloaded. Basically asking them to
> continue to keep drowning. Ultimately if the Server WG is going to be
> successful it needs to be able to do so on it's own steam.
>
> I'm sure Stephen will happily be around to answer questions if and
> when it's necessary. I suspect all the answers will be in the list
> archives or the meeting notes TBH.
Sorry if that came across as unfair. The point was to find out whether there is also an
alternative solution that equally prevents said „drowning“ and overload. And acknowledges
at the same time his many years of high and successful commitment.
Nothing unfair about it.
Yes, I'll be around and I'll try to participate as time allows, but my
primary focus these days is on the Fedora->ELN->RHEL pipeline. There's
a lot of overlap with Fedora Server, so I'll certainly still be
involved, but I just cannot commit to the level of involvement that WG
membership would require.