mostly through written tickets on bugzilla and fedora blocker bugs. Then we
QA test different bugs to see if we get the same results.
On Sun, 31 Oct 2021 at 14:35, Peter Boy <pboy(a)uni-bremen.de> wrote:
Dear Ahmed
> Am 31.10.2021 um 13:39 schrieb Ahmed Almeleh <
aalmeleh.whatever.0101(a)gmail.com>:
>
> I didn't yet test the server variant of the x86_64 architecture of
Fedora 35 RC 1.2 manually; however I have tested some of the base images
for Fedora workstation 35 RC 1.1 for the MATE spin. All of which passed.
Also I tested the "Everything netinst" for Fedora Workstation 35 RC 1.2
that passed as well. Majority of the tests are ran by Coconut, one of the
bots. Mostly through openQA. If required I can test the server server
variant of the x86_64 architecture of Fedora 35 RC 1.2 manually. I do think
that manual testing is better as bots are able to sometimes become faulty.
many many thanks for your offering. I'm afraid it's too late now for
testing the installation. F35 is go and Tuesday is release time. Now one
can only hope. But it would be very helpful if we could count on your help
for rawhide / F36.
I really don’t know what is best to do. I’m wondering (and worrying) how
these issues came about. In fact, I don't even know what is tested per bot
in detail. With workstations, there are likely to be hardware and driver
peculiarities (different graphics adapters, proprietary wifi, etc.). With
headless servers, many things do not even arise. How does the workstation
WG organize all of that?
Thanks
Peter
_______________________________________________
server mailing list -- server(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to server-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/server@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure