Server SIG Weekly Meeting Minutes (2015-11-10)
by Stephen Gallagher
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
=========================================================
#fedora-meeting-1: Server SIG Weekly Meeting (2015-11-10)
=========================================================
Meeting started by sgallagh at 16:02:25 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2015-11-10/serversig.20...
.
Meeting summary
- ---------------
* roll call (sgallagh, 16:02:25)
* Agenda (sgallagh, 16:04:27)
* Agenda Item: Cockpit Release Criteria (sgallagh, 16:04:28)
* Agenda Item: Server/Cloud Interaction (sgallagh, 16:04:28)
* Agenda Item: Minimal Installation (sgallagh, 16:04:28)
* Cockpit Release Criteria (sgallagh, 16:05:53)
* LINK:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/server/2015-November/002114.html
(sgallagh, 16:07:41)
* LINK: http://fpaste.org/288885/ (mizmo, 16:19:18)
* AGREED: New cockpit release criteria are accepted. (+7, 0, -0)
(sgallagh, 16:22:36)
* Server/Cloud Interaction (sgallagh, 16:22:42)
* ACTION: mhayden and jds2001 will be the primary contacts with the
Cloud SIG to discuss Server positioning in public clouds (sgallagh,
16:27:20)
* Minimal Installation (sgallagh, 16:32:23)
* AGREED: Proposal: Assert that Fedora Server is meant to be a defined
platform and not necessarily the most minimal platform possible.
(+5, 0, -0) (sgallagh, 16:57:17)
* Open Floor (sgallagh, 17:00:09)
Meeting ended at 17:01:57 UTC.
Action Items
- ------------
* mhayden and jds2001 will be the primary contacts with the Cloud SIG to
discuss Server positioning in public clouds
Action Items, by person
- -----------------------
* jds2001
* mhayden and jds2001 will be the primary contacts with the Cloud SIG
to discuss Server positioning in public clouds
* mhayden
* mhayden and jds2001 will be the primary contacts with the Cloud SIG
to discuss Server positioning in public clouds
* **UNASSIGNED**
* (none)
People Present (lines said)
- ---------------------------
* sgallagh (127)
* mizmo (58)
* jds2001 (33)
* mhayden (30)
* adamw (26)
* nirik (14)
* zodbot (14)
* stefw (6)
* linuxmodder (1)
* danofsatx (0)
* simo (0)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iEYEARECAAYFAlZCIyYACgkQeiVVYja6o6O1MwCgly2eTT9auXOUgkL1W3oH8tHr
aXEAnRNJ4rMa2LqqZoSkgzI5Oy3Jhtx5
=t5cS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
7 years, 4 months
Rolekit Weekly Meeting Minutes (2015-11-10)
by Stephen Gallagher
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
====================================
#fedora-server: rolekit (2015-11-10)
====================================
Meeting started by sgallagh at 14:30:03 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-server/2015-11-10/rolekitweekly.2...
.
Meeting summary
- ---------------
* init process (sgallagh, 14:30:04)
* Agenda (sgallagh, 14:30:30)
* Agenda Item: Issue Triage (sgallagh, 14:30:59)
* Agenda Item: Status Report (sgallagh, 14:31:07)
* Issue Triage (sgallagh, 14:32:42)
* https://github.com/libre-server/rolekit/issues/54 - The Domain
Controller role should support setting up the Vault (sgallagh,
14:33:59)
* Assigned to nilsph for Fedora 24 nice-to-have enhancement
(sgallagh, 14:48:53)
* https://github.com/libre-server/rolekit/issues/55 - Ensure static IP
for domain controller (sgallagh, 14:48:58)
* Making this a documentation bug, assigned to sgallagh for Fedora 24
(sgallagh, 14:54:33)
* https://github.com/libre-server/rolekit/issues/57 - Support redeploy()
for Domain Controller (sgallagh, 14:54:58)
* Domain Controller redeploy() is deferred to the Future milestone for
now (sgallagh, 15:05:23)
* Status Report (sgallagh, 15:06:57)
* LINK: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/1797 (sgallagh,
15:08:02)
* Lots of discussion on the redesign of the unit file creation and
monitoring. See full logs for details (sgallagh, 15:25:36)
Meeting ended at 15:44:27 UTC.
Action Items
- ------------
Action Items, by person
- -----------------------
* **UNASSIGNED**
* (none)
People Present (lines said)
- ---------------------------
* sgallagh (145)
* nilsph (69)
* twoerner (53)
* zodbot (8)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iEYEARECAAYFAlZCEQUACgkQeiVVYja6o6N3VwCgkJROjek7IiYLTeQXt43Bf3tM
itsAniBwxEKOFfwz9LFMZqdHtSYeomdi
=ND0O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
7 years, 4 months
Soliciting Agenda for Weekly Server SIG Agenda (2015-11-10)
by Stephen Gallagher
What do we want to discuss today, folks?
I think we should have a follow-up on the Cockpit criteria discussion. Additionally, I think it would be good to select a subcommittee to work with the Cloud SIG to work on our plans in that space. Lastly, I want to open a new topic: Should the Server SIG be responsible for the "minimal" environment group in comps.xml? Technically, it is available on the Server install media, so we should decide if that makes sense for us to own in an official capacity. Many people already assume that we do, but as of right now, minimal installs report themselves as non-productized installations.
7 years, 4 months
Call for topics for today's meeting - 2015-11-03
by Major Hayden
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Hey there,
I'm organizing today's meeting for Stephen and he asked me to send out an email calling for topics. If you have anything to discuss at today's IRC meeting, please let me know and I'll those topics added to the list.
Thanks!
- --
Major Hayden
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=nxv4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
7 years, 5 months
[F24 Criteria Change] FreeIPA Upgrades
by Stephen Gallagher
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Up to now, all of our release criteria for FreeIPA have been in terms
of fresh installations on a newly-installed system. However, there are
numerous individuals out there who are running FreeIPA on Fedora
systems and who would suffer greatly if an upgrade from the previous
version did not work.
I propose that the following release criterion be added for Fedora 24
and onwards:
Beta Criterion:
* For any system with a configured and enabled FreeIPA server (or
Domain Controller Role powered by the same), it must be possible to
upgrade from Fedora N to Fedora N+1 and have the same set of domain
controller services available after upgrade.
As a secondary criterion, I'd also like to recommend that we add:
Final Criterion:
* For any system with a configured and enabled FreeIPA server (or
Domain Controller Role powered by the same), it must be possible to
upgrade from Fedora N to Fedora N+1 and have the same set of domain
controller services available after upgrade without manual intervention.
(Note, that secondary criterion is not currently possible; there is a
manual upgrade script that must be run post-distro-upgrade). See
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/5373 for more details.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iEYEARECAAYFAlY3ewQACgkQeiVVYja6o6PqNgCdGQJz1NoRbonDIsAsmDvCovQY
qPgAn3iuZFIbiQ+sGt6GeyeN+uDj1GHQ
=KjHi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
7 years, 5 months