On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 09:09:39AM -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 09:09:39 -0500
From: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh(a)redhat.com>
To: "Fedora SELinux support list for users & developers."
<fedora-selinux-list(a)redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Should Yum and up2date understand SELinux roles
Reply-To: "Fedora SELinux support list for users & developers."
<fedora-selinux-list(a)redhat.com>
Tom Mitchell wrote:
>Should yum check "id" for sysadm_r role?
>
....
No if unlimitedUsers tunable is set the following rule needs to be
added
to rpm.te
ifdef(`unlimitedUsers', `
domain_auto_trans(staff_t, rpm_exec_t, rpm_t)
')
Thank you unlimitedUsers was set (will make the change and retest soon).
Will your small snip of policy be in a future version of rpm.te?
--
T o m M i t c h e l l
/dev/null the ultimate in secure storage.