On 09/27/2011 11:37 AM, Vadym Chepkov wrote:
On Sep 27, 2011, at 9:01 AM, Miroslav Grepl wrote:
On 09/25/2011 12:34 AM, Vadym Chepkov wrote:
Hi,
I think man httpd_selinux is outdated in RHEL6
it looks like proper name for httpd_sys_content_rw_t is httpd_sys_rw_content_t.
at least rectorecon is trying to correct it all the time :
for example:
restorecon reset /var/www/sel_blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/logo-150x150.jpg context system_u:object_r:httpd_sys_rw_content_t:s0->system_u:object_r:httpd_sys_content_rw_t:s0
Vadym
-- selinux mailing list selinux@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux
Vadym,
rpm -q selinux-policy
Yep, I upgraded to 6.1 and manual was changed. It is still inconsistent though:
selinux-policy-3.7.19-93.el6_1.7.noarch
man httpd_selinux
httpd_sys_rw_content_t - Set files with httpd_sys_rw_content_t if you want httpd_sys_script_exec_t scripts and the daemon to read/write the data, and dis- allow other non sys scripts from access. httpd_sys_content_ra_t - Set files with httpd_sys_content_ra_t if you want httpd_sys_script_exec_t scripts and the daemon to read/append to the file, and disallow other non sys scripts from access.
why "rw" is a prefix, but "ra" is a suffix ?
Thanks, Vadym
We have more fixes in the latest RHEL6.2 policy but this is a bug which needs to be fixed.