> You'll find (e.g. via
https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/)
> there's already a stalled review for htslib:
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326504
Sure I will keep in mind to check the current review status and Copr, and etc.
I take a look at the ticket for htslib.
For the htslib bugzilla ticket
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326504
I updated htslib.spec to the latest version 1.9, and commented on it.
Is there any item to fix for the htslib.spec?
Could you comment for the ticket ?
Thanks.
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 11:17 AM Jun Aruga <jaruga(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Dominik and Dave, thanks for the help and tips!
>
> You'll find (e.g. via
https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/)
> there's already a stalled review for htslib:
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326504
Sure I will keep in mind to check the current review status and Copr, and etc.
I take a look at the ticket for htslib.
>
> > For what it's worth, I'm starting to build some HPC packages for
aarch64
> > in copr, including Extrae et al from the Mont Blanc stable.
>
> Oh thanks. Yes, Mont Blanc arch is aarch64.
>
> --
> Jun Aruga | He - His - Him
--
Jun | He - His - Him
jaruga(a)redhat.com / IRC: jaruga