2014-05-22 22:23 GMT+02:00 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@gmail.com:
2014-05-22 17:13 GMT-03:00 Thomas Spura tomspur@fedoraproject.org:
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@gmail.com wrote:
2014-05-22 13:39 GMT-03:00 Thomas Spura tomspur@fedoraproject.org:
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@gmail.com wrote:
2014-05-22 12:32 GMT-03:00 Paul Howarth paul@city-fan.org:
On 17/05/14 17:39, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: > > 2014-05-16 21:23 GMT-03:00 Paul Howarth paul@city-fan.org: >> >> On Fri, 16 May 2014 12:37:19 -0300 >> Paulo César Pereira de Andrade >> paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@gmail.com wrote: >> >>> Hi sorry for adding the CC, but trying hard to get you attention :-) >>> >>> 2014-05-15 16:50 GMT-03:00 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade >>> paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@gmail.com: >>>> >>>> I am in the last steps on getting sagemath 6.2 working, so, >>>> what should be done: >>> >>> >>> It would be better to coordinate the update, so... >>> >>>> o Update to pari 2.7.0 -- optional >>> >>> >>> At least for sagemath it is ok to rebuild pari 2.7.0; I will use >>> this patch: >>> >>> https://abf.rosalinux.ru/openmandriva/sagemath/blob/master/sagemath-pari2.7.... >>> and drop this: >>> >>> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/sagemath.git/tree/sagemath-nopari2.6.patc... >> >> >> Note that dist-git now has pari 2.7.1 but it's not built yet; that will >> change when the mass rebuild lands. > > > For sagemath I can apply the patches to support pari 2.7 later, but > it probably would be better to build pari earlier. At least sagemath > is already broken for almost a month in rawhide due to other > dependencies. > > Can you rebuild pari in the next few days please? This would also > ensure that the mass rebuild would not let pass broken packages > in case it builds packages that needs pari before pari itself.
I've now built pari 2.7.1 in Rawhide. I kept the old library around for now to avoid broken deps whilst packages are migrated to the new version.
Many thanks! Major issue now for sagemath is ipython, that I hope should be resolved and available soon.
I got now the unbundling exception approved and want to update python-tornado after the mass rebuild is over. Then I'll update ipython as ipthon requires a newer python-tornado.
Would also ipython 2.X be fine, or do you must have version 1.2.1? I was already working on the 2.X series before you were writing about version 1.2.1... :/
It starts and can start the notebook without problems, so I think it is safe. Only one warning:
---%<--- $ sage ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Sage Version 6.2, Release Date: 2014-05-06 │ │ Type "notebook()" for the browser-based notebook interface. │ │ Type "help()" for help. │ └────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ WARNING: Hook shutdown_hook is deprecated. Use the atexit module instead. sage: ---%<---
I have no reasons to think it could cause problems.
Great!
I'll then now prepare the pyhton-tornado update for next week and next is ipython. Should I let you know, when I have a scratch build of ipython before updating it in rawhide, so you can do the final testings?
Usually, if it is going to fail it fails at start (all I got was the warning), so I do not believe there will be any issues. But it would be ok to know about a scratch build and better yet when it is available in rawhide.
I think the ipython package won't change much after this scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6883972
I'm waiting for feedback in the fpc ticket, if all bundled() provides are sane. So possibly by the end of the next week I can built it. Or beginning of June before the mass rebuilt.
Greetings, Tom