Yes 'not checked' - fingers did not type those letter the brain transmitted.
V/r
David W. Moessbauer
System Engineer
Progeny Systems Corporation
david.moessbauer(a)progeny.net
SIPR: david.moessbauer.ctr(a)progeny.spawar-chas.navy.smil.mil
(410) 627-5633 (M)
(703) 368-6107 x315 (O) / x125 (lab)
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone
-------- Original message --------
From: "Ronayne, James K." <jkronay(a)nsa.gov>
Date: 09/03/2013 10:44 (GMT-05:00)
To: scap-security-guide(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
Subject: (nwl) RE: Aug29 Benchmarks
Do you mean Notchecked? "Not completed" is not a valid XCCDF results value.
"Not selected" means the rules were not turned on for the profile you ran.
When I ran the content I also got three "Unknown" results. I haven't gone
back to figure out why.
"Not checked" means the rule was selected but the tool was unable to run the
checks. This will happen if the content uses a check system the tool does not support.
Was this content that still included the "OCIL-transitional" check system? If
so, those rules could not be checked. If you run the OCIL content in SCC you will have
the opportunity to complete those checks. I had 21 not checked rule results when I ran
the OCIL-transitional content.
-----Original Message-----
From: scap-security-guide-bounces(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
[mailto:scap-security-guide-bounces@lists.fedorahosted.org] On Behalf Of Moessbauer,
David
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2013 9:45 AM
To: scap-security-guide(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
Subject: RE: Aug29 Benchmarks
Thanks, that has allowed the scan to complete.
Regarding results, can someone please advise what the delta is btwn 'Not
Completed' and 'Not Selected'? I show 21 NC and 166 NS...
v/r
David Moessbauer
(410) 627-5633 (M)
The Information contained in or attached to this communication may be confidential and
privileged proprietary intended only for the individual/s or entity to whom/which it is
addressed. Any unauthorized use, distribution, copying or disclosure of this information
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please contact
the sender immediately and delete from your system.
-----Original Message-----
From: scap-security-guide-bounces(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
[mailto:scap-security-guide-bounces@lists.fedorahosted.org] On Behalf Of Ronayne, James
K.
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2013 7:18 AM
To: 'scap-security-guide(a)lists.fedorahosted.org'
Subject: (nwl) RE: Aug29 Benchmarks
I had the same problem. I ran it and it got stuck at roughly the same point. After about
20 hours I killed it. I deselected the "rpm_verify_permissions" rule in the
XCCDF and ran it again without any problems. I reported it to SPAWAR but they could not
recreate the problem.
Jim
-----Original Message-----
From: scap-security-guide-bounces(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
[mailto:scap-security-guide-bounces@lists.fedorahosted.org] On Behalf Of Moessbauer,
David
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2013 1:55 PM
To: scap-security-guide(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
Subject: Aug29 Benchmarks
Shawn,
Downloaded the latest benchmarks zip from your buildroot site and have loaded/run them in
SCAP 3.1 (as well as 3.1.1.RC6) and they do not seem to complete.
They get to a point where the following is displayed, but they don't actually seem to
complete:
> LOCALHOST.LOCALDOMAIN: Getting detail for package: 1655 of 1655
> LOCALHOST.LOCALDOMAIN: Finish getting package details
> LOCALHOST.LOCALDOMAIN: for object: oval:ssg:obj:1991
Is this a known issue?
Thoughts?
v/r
David Moessbauer
(410) 627-5633 (M)
The Information contained in or attached to this communication may be confidential and
privileged proprietary intended only for the individual/s or entity to whom/which it is
addressed. Any unauthorized use, distribution, copying or disclosure of this information
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please contact
the sender immediately and delete from your system.
-----Original Message-----
From: scap-security-guide-bounces(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
[mailto:scap-security-guide-bounces@lists.fedorahosted.org] On Behalf Of Shawn Wells
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2013 1:20 PM
To: scap-security-guide(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] OVAL template testing
On 8/30/13 1:09 PM, Jeffrey Blank wrote:
These all look good to me -- please push.
Pushed
--
Shawn Wells
Director, Innovation Programs
shawn(a)redhat.com | 443.534.0130
@shawndwells
_______________________________________________
scap-security-guide mailing list
scap-security-guide(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide
_______________________________________________
scap-security-guide mailing list
scap-security-guide(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide
_______________________________________________
scap-security-guide mailing list
scap-security-guide(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide
_______________________________________________
scap-security-guide mailing list
scap-security-guide(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide
_______________________________________________
scap-security-guide mailing list
scap-security-guide(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide