Thanks. I will check it out.
Fyi. I found a couple references at scaprepo.com
tracing to Windows 2012.
Eg. Oval:org.secpod.oval:def:38125. / cce-37631-9
However at first glance they did not appear to be very granular.
aside: l envisioned the following 'wag' acceptance strawman:
* dumping the state of (significant/ published/ relevant) TPM registers.
* Dumping the state of any TPM relevant config items elements such as
* Validating the dumped elements against TPM spec(s).
* Computing generic statistics.;and,
* 'optionally', computing specific statistics by validating the dumped
elements against published errata.
From: Trevor Vaughan
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 19:00
To: SCAP Security Guide
Reply To: SCAP Security Guide
Subject: Re: TPM posture inquiry
We're working on this right now in the SIMP project https://simp-project.com
We will be providing a set of custom Facter facts to gather this information and report it
back for automated configuration.
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Brent Kimberley
Are there automated methods for assessing TPM posture?
For example - verify TPM is: enabled, activated, contains a unique EK (i.e. tpm_getpubek
is not reflective of known compliance vector fragments.)
( I apologize in advance if this question is off topic or common knowledge.)
THIS MESSAGE IS FOR THE USE OF THE INTENDED RECIPIENT(S) ONLY AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION
THAT IS PRIVILEGED, PROPRIETARY, CONFIDENTIAL, AND/OR EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER ANY
RELEVANT PRIVACY LEGISLATION. No rights to any privilege have been waived. If you are not
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission,
dissemination, distribution, copying, conversion to hard copy, taking of action in
reliance on or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
intended recipient and have received this message in error, please notify me by return
e-mail and delete or destroy all copies of this message.
SCAP Security Guide mailing list
Vice President, Onyx Point, Inc
(410) 541-6699 x788
-- This account not approved for unencrypted proprietary information --