Hey Guys
Just downloaded the RHEL 7.4 installation media and attempted to use the oscap-anaconda features. Selected "security" during the installer, and noticed a few things:
(1) The CUI/NIST 800-171 profile has the description from OSPP:
(2) There are multiple RHEL7 STIG options:
I'm not sure how/why this is happening.
The 800-171 profile does extend OSPP. Do we need a "extends" for the profile description field? https://github.com/OpenSCAP/scap-security-guide/blob/master/RHEL/7/input/pro...
On 08/03/2017 02:28 AM, Shawn Wells wrote:
Hey Guys
Just downloaded the RHEL 7.4 installation media and attempted to
use the oscap-anaconda features. Selected "security" during the installer, and noticed a few things:
(1) The CUI/NIST 800-171 profile has the description from OSPP:
(2) There are multiple RHEL7 STIG options:
I'm not sure how/why this is happening.
The 800-171 profile does extend OSPP. Do we need a "extends" for the profile description field? https://github.com/OpenSCAP/scap-security-guide/blob/master/RHEL/7/input/pro...
scap-security-guide mailing list -- scap-security-guide@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to scap-security-guide-leave@lists.fedorahosted.org
Hey Shawn, ad (2) this is known issue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1437106
For (1) that description is the same that SCAP Workbench displays, and oscap generates from the guides (as can be seen http://static.open-scap.org/ssg-guides/ssg-rhel7-guide-index.html). Extend concatenates description of extended profile and the extending one. Is it a bug?
Marek
On 03/08/17 11:07, Marek Haicman wrote:
On 08/03/2017 02:28 AM, Shawn Wells wrote:
Hey Guys
Just downloaded the RHEL 7.4 installation media and attempted to
use the oscap-anaconda features. Selected "security" during the installer, and noticed a few things:
(1) The CUI/NIST 800-171 profile has the description from OSPP:
(2) There are multiple RHEL7 STIG options:
I'm not sure how/why this is happening.
The 800-171 profile does extend OSPP. Do we need a "extends" for the profile description field? https://github.com/OpenSCAP/scap-security-guide/blob/master/RHEL/7/input/pro...
scap-security-guide mailing list -- scap-security-guide@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to scap-security-guide-leave@lists.fedorahosted.org
Hey Shawn, ad (2) this is known issue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1437106
For (1) that description is the same that SCAP Workbench displays, and oscap generates from the guides (as can be seen http://static.open-scap.org/ssg-guides/ssg-rhel7-guide-index.html). Extend concatenates description of extended profile and the extending one. Is it a bug?
This is not a bug. To replace extended description, extending description element should have attribute override="true", like the title element has.
Marek _______________________________________________ scap-security-guide mailing list -- scap-security-guide@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to scap-security-guide-leave@lists.fedorahosted.org
On 03/08/17 15:36, Watson Yuuma Sato wrote:
On 03/08/17 11:07, Marek Haicman wrote:
On 08/03/2017 02:28 AM, Shawn Wells wrote:
Hey Guys
Just downloaded the RHEL 7.4 installation media and attempted
to use the oscap-anaconda features. Selected "security" during the installer, and noticed a few things:
(1) The CUI/NIST 800-171 profile has the description from OSPP:
(2) There are multiple RHEL7 STIG options:
I'm not sure how/why this is happening.
The 800-171 profile does extend OSPP. Do we need a "extends" for the profile description field? https://github.com/OpenSCAP/scap-security-guide/blob/master/RHEL/7/input/pro...
scap-security-guide mailing list -- scap-security-guide@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to scap-security-guide-leave@lists.fedorahosted.org
Hey Shawn, ad (2) this is known issue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1437106
For (1) that description is the same that SCAP Workbench displays, and oscap generates from the guides (as can be seen http://static.open-scap.org/ssg-guides/ssg-rhel7-guide-index.html). Extend concatenates description of extended profile and the extending one. Is it a bug?
This is not a bug. To replace extended description, extending description element should have attribute override="true", like the title element has.
Well, this is a bug if description of CUI/NIST 800-171 is not expected to be appended to description of OSPP Profile.
Marek _______________________________________________ scap-security-guide mailing list -- scap-security-guide@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to scap-security-guide-leave@lists.fedorahosted.org
On 8/3/17 11:35 AM, Watson Yuuma Sato wrote:
On 03/08/17 15:36, Watson Yuuma Sato wrote:
On 03/08/17 11:07, Marek Haicman wrote:
On 08/03/2017 02:28 AM, Shawn Wells wrote:
Hey Guys
Just downloaded the RHEL 7.4 installation media and attempted
to use the oscap-anaconda features. Selected "security" during the installer, and noticed a few things:
(1) The CUI/NIST 800-171 profile has the description from OSPP:
(2) There are multiple RHEL7 STIG options:
I'm not sure how/why this is happening.
The 800-171 profile does extend OSPP. Do we need a "extends" for the profile description field? https://github.com/OpenSCAP/scap-security-guide/blob/master/RHEL/7/input/pro...
scap-security-guide mailing list -- scap-security-guide@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to scap-security-guide-leave@lists.fedorahosted.org
Hey Shawn, ad (2) this is known issue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1437106
For (1) that description is the same that SCAP Workbench displays, and oscap generates from the guides (as can be seen http://static.open-scap.org/ssg-guides/ssg-rhel7-guide-index.html). Extend concatenates description of extended profile and the extending one. Is it a bug?
This is not a bug. To replace extended description, extending description element should have attribute override="true", like the title element has.
Well, this is a bug if description of CUI/NIST 800-171 is not expected to be appended to description of OSPP Profile.
IMHO it comes down to the profiles not including "override=true" in the profile descriptions.
Never knew they were needed. How come we didn't have this problem in earlier editions of oscap-anaconda? The profiles don't seem to have override=true in the description field, but in prior RHEL releases things were OK.
On 8/3/17 2:53 PM, Shawn Wells wrote:
On 8/3/17 11:35 AM, Watson Yuuma Sato wrote:
On 03/08/17 15:36, Watson Yuuma Sato wrote:
On 03/08/17 11:07, Marek Haicman wrote:
On 08/03/2017 02:28 AM, Shawn Wells wrote:
Hey Guys
Just downloaded the RHEL 7.4 installation media and attempted
to use the oscap-anaconda features. Selected "security" during the installer, and noticed a few things:
(1) The CUI/NIST 800-171 profile has the description from OSPP:
(2) There are multiple RHEL7 STIG options:
I'm not sure how/why this is happening.
The 800-171 profile does extend OSPP. Do we need a "extends" for the profile description field? https://github.com/OpenSCAP/scap-security-guide/blob/master/RHEL/7/input/pro...
scap-security-guide mailing list -- scap-security-guide@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to scap-security-guide-leave@lists.fedorahosted.org
Hey Shawn, ad (2) this is known issue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1437106
For (1) that description is the same that SCAP Workbench displays, and oscap generates from the guides (as can be seen http://static.open-scap.org/ssg-guides/ssg-rhel7-guide-index.html). Extend concatenates description of extended profile and the extending one. Is it a bug?
This is not a bug. To replace extended description, extending description element should have attribute override="true", like the title element has.
Well, this is a bug if description of CUI/NIST 800-171 is not expected to be appended to description of OSPP Profile.
IMHO it comes down to the profiles not including "override=true" in the profile descriptions.
Never knew they were needed. How come we didn't have this problem in earlier editions of oscap-anaconda? The profiles don't seem to have override=true in the description field, but in prior RHEL releases things were OK.
PR submitted: https://github.com/OpenSCAP/scap-security-guide/pull/2203
scap-security-guide@lists.fedorahosted.org