Thank you, for that! I had an inkling that was all there was to it, but
I had read a blog somewhere on pam_faillock that was using language like
"needs to be in /etc/pam.d/login".
- Sean Alderman
"Peace begins with a smile." - Blessed Mother Teresa
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Crawford, Nicholas P CTR USARMY RDECOM
CERDEC (US) <nicholas.p.crawford.ctr(a)mail.mil> wrote:
They're cascaded via the "include" directives included
in login (as well as
most others, i.e. sshd, gdm, sudo).
Thus system-auth changes carry over to all other subsystems, not just
Man pages for system-auth and system-auth-ac give some background.
The use of pam.d/login in the pam_faillock man page is simply an example on
Nicholas P. Crawford, Contractor
Senior UNIX Systems Administrator
Manufacturing Techniques, Inc. (MTEQ)
NVESD Network Services Branch, US Army
work: 703.704.2299 dsn: 312.654.2299
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sean [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 23, 2015 2:41 PM
> To: scap-security-guide(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
> Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Question on use of pam_faillock.so in
> account lockout remediation
> I was curious if someone could point me toward the reasoning behind
> why these remediation scripts are using /etc/pam.d/system- auth and
> /etc/pam.d/password-auth? It seems like the man page for pam_faillock
> directs the usage to /etc/pam.d/login instead.
> Thank you kindly,