Depends on how agnostic the content is.
It would just be primarily for the RHEL/Fedora products and derivatives i.e
CentOS, etc.
Gabe
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:07 AM, Shawn Wells <shawn(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Depends on how agnostic the content is.
>
> E.g the webmin is also meant to work on Gentoo/Ubuntu in addition to RHEL,
> so made sense for its own tree.
>
> --
> Shawn Wells
> Director, Innovation Programs
> shawn(a)redhat.com | 443.534.0130
> @shawndwells
>
> On Mar 20, 2015, at 9:01 AM, Gabe Alford <redhatrises(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Sorry user keyboard error.
>
> I am currently in the mist of securing some of my systems with the BIND
> and HTTP STIGs, and was wanting to add them back into the
> scap-security-guide content when I am done. My question is should there be
> a separate content tree like what we have for RHEL/6, RHEL/7, etc. but for
> BIND and HTTP, or should the XCCDF be added to
> RHEL/6/input/services/dns.xml and RHEL/6/input/services/http.xml?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gabe
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Gabe Alford <redhatrises(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am currently in the mist of securing some of my systems with
>> the BIND and HTTP STIGs, and
>>
>
> --
> SCAP Security Guide mailing list
> scap-security-guide(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide
>
https://github.com/OpenSCAP/scap-security-guide/
>
>
> --
> SCAP Security Guide mailing list
> scap-security-guide(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/scap-security-guide
>
https://github.com/OpenSCAP/scap-security-guide/
>