On 7/31/13 1:36 PM, "Shawn Wells" shawn@redhat.com wrote:
On 7/31/13 11:31 AM, Stuart Green wrote:
Ah-ha!! Thanks, I was looking for the buglist actually and couldn't find it!
Glad to be aboard :)
Hm. Perhaps this whole thing can be simplified.
Right now we have two checks: - package_telnet-server_removed.xml - service_telnetd_disabled.xml
They seem redundant, and I'm failing to find reasons against just deleting service_telnetd_disabled. There's no way telnet can be enabled if the package isn't installed, right?
Is there a reason to continue maintaining both checks?
Shawn, I don't think so. I believe there are other checks that have the same redundancy also R/ Brian