On 7/31/13 1:36 PM, "Shawn Wells" <shawn(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 7/31/13 11:31 AM, Stuart Green wrote:
>
> Ah-ha!! Thanks, I was looking for the buglist actually and couldn't
> find it!
>
>
> Glad to be aboard :)
Hm. Perhaps this whole thing can be simplified.
Right now we have two checks:
- package_telnet-server_removed.xml
- service_telnetd_disabled.xml
They seem redundant, and I'm failing to find reasons against just
deleting service_telnetd_disabled. There's no way telnet can be enabled
if the package isn't installed, right?
Is there a reason to continue maintaining both checks?
Shawn,
I don't think so. I believe there are other checks that have the same
redundancy also
R/ Brian