I think that the decision was made to eliminate any 'official'
government-style mappings in the builds that they simply cannot meet.
I agree that it should really be a flag that you can flip to turn them back
on but I understand disabling them by default.
On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 6:04 AM Tim Burress <taj(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
Thanks for that! I can't help wondering if people have
separating CentOS and SL so that they can be treated individually without a
lot of workarounds? Given that the rules and the checks are already
centralized in linux_os (I think), it seems like there wouldn't be too much
duplication, though I the nice thing about the derivatives is that a change
in RHEL automatically gets propagated to the derivatives.
Alternatively, I wonder why it was decided to remove profiles like OSPP
from CentOS? Of course, no CentOS system could meet all of those criteria
(like the need for commercial support), but it seems like that's a user
decision, and it's much easier to de-select one rule than to hack the logic
that pulls profiles out.
Just some early morning thoughts, though!
scap-security-guide mailing list --
To unsubscribe send an email to
Fedora Code of Conduct:
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Vice President, Onyx Point, Inc
(410) 541-6699 x788
-- This account not approved for unencrypted proprietary information --