Yes, but please hold off on remediation content until the OVAL validates
per the schematron, and there is a means of handling parameters/variables
in fix content. If you don't eat your meat, you can't have any pudding.
But we should be able to have both.
Subscribers will note that while they got their STIG, there is no automated
checking content for it. But it is very close.
Please see the output from "make validate" for schematron validation
Also, how many have run the automated scans per:
Do the OVAL checks which are executed here work? Would you like to see
these in an automated STIG, as-is? Or would some QA first be nice?
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Brian Millett <bmillett(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 1 Jun 2013 17:20:12 -0400
Shawn Wells <shawn.d.wells(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Well, for me ACK.
The hardest part of maintaining a bunch of remediation scrips is to make
that the "fix" is consistant with the "check". I've spent much
remediating my remediation.
I like it.
"Orin Zento has powerful friends. By embarrassing him, you embarrassed
them. Today, you have made new enemies. If I were you, Commander, I
would watch things very carefully. You are not the most popular person
in government circles right now."
'So what else is new?'
-- [ Senator Hidoshi and Sinclair, "By Any Means Necessary"]
scap-security-guide mailing list